Flutter vs React Native

Side-by-side comparison of 2 ecommerce template stacks. Every dimension reflects real production measurements and real trade-offs — no marketing fluff.

Flutter

Flutter renders every pixel via Skia instead of bridging to native UI — the result is pixel-perfect consistency across iOS, Android, and (optionally later) desktop and web. Pick Flutter when mobile UI polish is a differentiator and you have dedicated mobile engineering capacity.

What you gain

  • Pixel-perfect consistency across iOS, Android, and every device generation
  • Cross-platform from one Dart codebase — one language, one toolchain, two platforms
  • Riverpod or Provider for state — both are mature and well-documented
  • Material 3 and Cupertino widgets give you platform-appropriate defaults where you want them

Trade-offs

  • Dart is unfamiliar to most JavaScript teams — 2-4 weeks of ramp-up for a React team
  • Code sharing with a web frontend is limited — Flutter Web exists but isn't a Next.js storefront
  • Ecosystem is smaller than React Native for commerce-specific integrations

Performance

First meaningful paint ~1.6s on a mid-tier Android phone. Skia rendering is slightly faster than React Native's bridge-to-native-widgets approach on identical hardware.

SEO positioning

N/A for the app itself — mobile apps aren't indexed by web search engines. App Store Optimization (ASO) replaces SEO for discovery. Pair Flutter with a web storefront on any of the SSR stacks for full-funnel coverage.

Browse Flutter

React Native

React Native + Expo is the default choice for a cross-platform mobile ecommerce app when your web team already writes React. You can share TypeScript types, API clients, and business logic with a Next.js web storefront through a monorepo.

What you gain

  • Cross-platform iOS and Android from one codebase — faster than building native apps separately
  • Expo managed workflow handles build, sign, release, and OTA update infrastructure
  • Shares types and business logic with a Next.js web storefront through monorepo packages
  • OTA updates let you push content and pricing changes without an App Store review

Trade-offs

  • App Store and Play Store review adds days to every major release
  • Native dependency drift can block releases — budget occasional rescue work
  • Push notifications, deep linking, and biometric auth all work but need per-project setup

Performance

First meaningful paint around 1.8s on mobile hardware — feels faster than web because there's no network round trip for the app binary.

SEO positioning

N/A for the app itself (App Store / Play Store discovery, not web search). Mobile apps complement a web storefront rather than replace it for SEO.

Browse React Native

How to read this comparison

Performance numbers come from the MVPHub benchmark suite — real Lighthouse runs against production-built template instances on mobile Slow 4G. See /benchmarks for the full dataset.
SEO positioning reflects how each framework handles organic search — SSR vs CSR, hydration overhead, and how quickly Google can index pages on the first crawl.
Trade-offs are the things you'll pay for this choice. They're specific to ecommerce, not generic framework pros-and-cons.
Every template matching these profiles ships with Medusa by default. You can swap the backend to Shopify, custom APIs, or others via the template's API layer.

Popular comparisons

Not sure which to pick?

Take the 4-question MVP Finder quiz — we'll recommend a specific framework based on your channel, stack preference, backend choice, and vertical.

Take the quiz
Flutter vs React Native: Ecommerce Template Comparison | MVPHub